Difference between revisions of "Regen Living Roadmap"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
4 models starting from most traditional or fiat-based to most decentralized or crypto based (even if decentralized is not the best term...): | 4 models starting from most traditional or fiat-based to most decentralized or crypto based (even if decentralized is not the best term...): | ||
=Phase 1: Fiat= | =Fiat to Crypto= | ||
A donor-advised fund that has a 501c3 as its core and is crypto-friendly. It practically operates as a grant proposal sponsor for approving grant proposals from regen projects on the ground. It receives funds from major institutional donors/hight-net worth individuals. | ==Phase 1: Fiat== | ||
A donor-advised fund that has a 501c3 as its core and is crypto-friendly. It practically operates as a grant proposal sponsor for approving grant proposals from regen projects on the ground. It receives funds from major institutional donors/hight-net worth individuals. | |||
=Phase 2: = | =Phase 2: = | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 27 June 2022
4 models starting from most traditional or fiat-based to most decentralized or crypto based (even if decentralized is not the best term...):
Fiat to Crypto
Phase 1: Fiat
A donor-advised fund that has a 501c3 as its core and is crypto-friendly. It practically operates as a grant proposal sponsor for approving grant proposals from regen projects on the ground. It receives funds from major institutional donors/hight-net worth individuals.
Phase 2:
An impact investment mechanism or Regen Living Impact Fund: leveraging the centralized fiat markets we could raise a Fund as a "bond, impact fund, carbon instrument" over a blockchain such as COSMOS and with the already developed TGrade (infrastructure). This would allow us to do this for ourselves or be set up as a for-profit Foundation (US or Europe based) or an investing LLC (again US or Europe based) that advice/do this for projects in needs of investment (think cooperatives, LLCs, Trusts...).
Phase 3:
3. An $ECO and $LIVING currency tokens: This is similar to the ECORISE model. We set up the parameters for these two tokens (eco capturing the value/MRV of regenerative practices) and $LIVING being the token that algorithmically governs the mint/burn relationship. Two tokens to govern, fund and develop a regenerative ecosystem of PermaCommons (with liquidity pools). Probably on Cosmos.
Phase 4: Crypto
Regen Living blockchain: A completely native L1 crypto-blockchain that is tailored to the Regenerative Institute standards and frameworks (and allows for integration with Regen Network (https://www.regen.network/) parameters. LLC (blockchain developer raising VC funds) + Foundation.
1. What?
Regen Living DHO: We use land community ownership, carbon markets, and an emerging eco-credit class to create natural returns and set the bar higher about what regen development is.
So our closest references/"competitors" are ECORISE and BASIN DAO:
https://ecorise.finance/ https://www.basin.global/#Get-Notified https://regennetwork.notion.site/Built-On-Regen-Network-c6266114116842e389258747454f9f07?p=dfd3404140474cce929e31f977c51fb2
2. Where?
We bring on chain the Regenerative Community Development Famework ©️
Our chain builds on top of COSMOS and Regen Network's infrastructure (built on Cosmos). They are developing new ecological methodolgy frameworks We the $ECOGYLA token bringing onchain our framework.
3. How?
We join R&D efforts with Regen Network to deploy our methodology. That means being one of their partners for #BuiltonRegen: https://regennetwork.notion.site/Built-On-Regen-Network-c6266114116842e389258747454f9f07
We attract scientists and researchers interested to build this through Leah's academic circles. Leah and I draft the application grant for Regen Network. Our DHO builds the community. i.e. @GnomadicLiving said 15,000 acres of land to develop (we join efforts).